Cases 31 - 40 of 88
Leroy Hunter v. Attorney General State of Cali, et al
as 10-16757
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY DEWITT HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA, KEN CLARK, L. POLK, Associate Warden and others
Burkett v. Clark et al
as 1:2010cv01461
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Burkett
Defendant:
Ken Clark, K. Allison, L. Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Bone v. Marvin Polk
as 10-6969
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY MAURICE BONE
Respondent - Appellee:
MARVIN L. POLK, Warden
John Catanzarite v. R. Horel, et al
as 10-16277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN JOSEPH CATANZARITE
Defendant - Appellee:
R. HOREL, Acting Warden, D. SMITH, R. LINFORD, Counselor and others
Hunter v. Attorney General for the State of California et al
as 1:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dewitt Hunter
Defendant:
Attorney General for the State of California, Department of Corrections Director, Ken Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godoy v. Wadsworth et al
as 1:2005cv02913
Plaintiff:
James Godoy
Defendant:
T. Wadsworth , Jean S. Woodford , S. Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miceli v. Gusman et al
as 2:2009cv08078
Plaintiff:
Michael Miceli
Defendant:
Samuel Gore , Michael Higgins , Mary Anne Benitez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Death)
POLK v. YOST
as 3:2009cv00309
Petitioner:
GREGORY L. POLK
Respondent:
JOHN YOST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hunter v. Attorney General State of California et al
as 1:2009cv01556
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dewitt Hunter
Defendant:
Attorney General State of California, Ken Clark, L. Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prophet v. Clark et al
as 1:2009cv01254
Plaintiff:
Joseph Danny Prophet
Defendant:
Ken Clark, J. Gallagher, L. Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
