Cases 31 - 40 of 1,365
Stenberg v. Langford
as 23-3165
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROSS STENBERG
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD LANGFORD
Barnes et al v. T&T Enterprises of Ohio, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
DOUG BARNES, ELIZABETH BARNES and KRISTA SORIANO
Defendant:
T&T ENTERPRISES OF OHIO, INC., DONNIE HARRIS and NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Not Classified By Court:
M Langford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Langford v. Philips North America LLC et al
as 5:2023cv01225
Defendant:
Philips RS North America LLC, Philips North America LLC, Philips Healthcare Informatics Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew W Langford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
LANGFORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01716
Plaintiff:
BILL LANGFORD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Langford v. Nelly
as 23-20407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert W. Langford
Defendant / Appellee:
Unknown Nelly, Denis McWonough, Donald M. Leny and others
Lumpkin v. Dowels et al
as 1:2023cv00990
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lumpkin
Defendant:
Kemsy Dowels, Clifford Mcdonald, Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Thomas v. Langford
as 23-3118
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDDIE LAMAR THOMAS, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
DON LANGFORD
Armstrong (ID 109483) v. Langford
as 5:2023cv03141
Petitioner:
Daryl Armstrong, Jr.
Respondent:
Don Langford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
