Cases 31 - 40 of 99
EL v. MATSON et al
as 2:2021cv01325
Plaintiff:
RYSHEIRD MALIK EL, RYSHEID MALIK EX REL BALDWIN and RYSHEID MALIK EL
Defendant:
NICHOLAS MATSON, JEFFEY GRANTZ, GEORGE LOWTHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GRENKE v. HOWSARE et al
as 3:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
SHAWN GRENKE
Defendant:
ERIN HOWSARE, DENNIS VOUGHT, VARSHA PANDYA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DAVIS v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00222
Plaintiff:
ELI DAVIS
Defendant:
SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT OVERMYER, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDEN SAWTELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Harris v. Pasquotank Correctional Institution et al
as 5:2021ct03236
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Harris
Defendant:
Pasquotank Correctional Institution, Sgt. Morris, A. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUXTON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01053
Plaintiff:
ANDY BUXTON
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MELINDA ADAMS, KAREN FEATHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
In Re: Christopher Corrado
as 21-1904
Petitioner:
Christopher Corrado
Respondent:
Suffolk County Police, Officer John Doe, 1, Officer John Doe, 2 and others
Blot v. Lauro et al
as 2:2021cv04225
Plaintiff:
Justin Blot
Defendant:
P.O. John R. Lauro, P.O. Michael J. Graham, Lieutenant JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEMMONS v. DOE et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
VICTOR K. LEMMONS, JR.
Defendant:
JANE DOE and LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NEAL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00599
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN WETZEL, KARAN FEATHER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY NEAL, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GRAHAM v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00146
Defendant:
JANE DOE, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION GREENE and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R. GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
