Cases 31 - 40 of 112
Acevedo et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11422
Plaintiff:
Robert Robertson, Catalino Robles, John Harty and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Lipinski et al v. Sandoz Inc.
as 2:2018cv09725
Defendant:
Sandoz Inc. and Sandoz, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lipinski and Thomas Lipinski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lipinski v. Jon Barry and Associates, Inc.
as 6:2018cv01076
Plaintiff:
James Lipinski
Defendant:
Jon Barry and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
El-Bey v. Lipinski et al
as 1:2018cv01975
Defendant:
Kristine D Brown, Nicole Lipinski, Thomas J Gatznee and others
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lipinski et al v. AOB Security, LLC
as 1:2018cv00791
Plaintiff:
Robert Lipinski and Security Designs, Inc.
Defendant:
AOB Security, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arbelaez et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv06543
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Arbelaez , Luz Arbelaez , Deborah Arbelaez and others
Defendant:
City of New York , Doris Lopez, Ryan Boylan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lipinski v. Jones
as 8:2017cv02031
Plaintiff:
Irene Elizabeth Lipinski
Defendant:
A. Brad Jones
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001
CHEVRON U.S.A., INC. et al v. LIPINSKI
as 2:2017cv00526
Plaintiff:
CHEVRON U.S.A., INC. and CHEVRON APPALACHIA, LLC
Defendant:
BRIAN LIPINSKI
Counter_claimant:
BRIAN LIPINSKI
Counter_defendant:
CHEVRON U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marom v. Town of Hempstead
as 17-1024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Marom
Defendant - Appellee:
Town of Hempstead, Kate Murry, Supervisor, Brian M. Nocella, Chief Building Inspector and others
Lipinski v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00175
Plaintiff:
Peter Lipinski
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
