Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Parker v. City of Tulsa, The
as 4:2016cv00134
Plaintiff:
Matthew Richard Parker
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2040
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Coombes v. Johnson et al
as 4:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
Matthew Richard Coombes
Defendant:
Dollar Rent A Car, Jeff Lamb, II, City of Des Moines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Palmieri v. USA, et al
as 14-5289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Matthew Richard Palmieri
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Naval Criminal Investigative Services, Maya Pilatowicz, Special Agent, Naval Criminal Investigative Service and others
Richard v. USA
as 2:2014cv03205
Plaintiff:
Matthew Richard
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Douglas v. St. Francois County Jail
as 4:2014cv01821
Plaintiff:
Edward Douglas
Defendant:
St. Francois County Jail, Dennis Smith, Hardy White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snyder v. Bullock et al
as 4:2014cv01711
Plaintiff:
William Miles Snyder
Defendant:
Dan Bullock, Dennis Smith, Hardy White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Coombes v. Starr County, Texas Shrf Dept, et al
as 14-41078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW RICHARD COOMBES
Defendant - Appellee:
STARR COUNTY, TEXAS SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, STARR COUNTY, TEXAS COUNTY ATTORNEY'S DEPARTMENT and JUDITH A. SOLIS
Matthew Peet, et al v. J. Kevin Checkett
as 14-6033
Debtor:
In re: Matthew Richard Peet and Marilynn Louise Peet
Debtor - Appellant:
Matthew Richard Peet and Marilynn Louise Peet
Trustee - Appellee:
James Kevin Checkett
Crisler v. Matthews Richards Healthcare Management, LLC
as 6:2014cv03373
Plaintiff:
Reena Crisler
Defendant:
Matthews Richards Healthcare Management, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Matthews Richards Healthcare Management, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Reena Crisler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
