Cases 31 - 40 of 118
Wesley v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2016cv01205
Plaintiff:
Daniel Clarence Wesley
Defendant:
Kathryn K. McCarthy, Mark Baker and Alan J. Popick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randy Knox v. Secretary Department of Correc, et al
as 16-1745
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, MARK BAKER, Doctor, Medical Director and others
Keyes et al v. Gunn et al
as 3:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
Billie Faye Keyes , Joshua Allen , Courtney Rena Fortune and others
Defendant:
Philip Gunn , Mark Baker , Richard Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Color-Web, Inc et al v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Printing & Packaging Machinery, Ltd. et al
as 1:2016cv01435
Plaintiff:
Color-Web, Inc , David Moyal and 1 800 Postcards, Inc.
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Printing & Packaging Machinery, Ltd., Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., RM Machinery Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Baker v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 1:2016cv00488
Plaintiff:
Mark Baker
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Baker v. Curtis W. Key Plumbing Contractors, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00565
Plaintiff:
Mark Baker
Defendant:
Curtis W. Key Plumbing Contractors, Inc. and Curtis W. Key
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SLOAN v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00170
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, ULLI KLEMM, FAITH AKDEMIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KNOX V. WETZEL et al
as 1:2015cv00078
Plaintiff:
RANDY KNOX
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL HARLOW, MARK BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2015cv00466
Plaintiff:
Randy Knox
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Michael Harlow, Mark Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLOAN v. HAINSWORTH et al
as 3:2014cv00249
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
MELISSA HAINSWORTH, DANIEL GEHLMANN, OFFICER HARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
