Cases 31 - 40 of 101
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 17-40384
Petitioner:
In re: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Respondent:
MICHAEL J. FISHER, Individually, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel, KEITH FRANKLIN and others
Fisher v. Samuthram et al
as 2:2017cv00206
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Fisher
Defendant:
Emmanual Samuthram and Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leesa Jacobson, et al v. United States Department of Ho, et al
as 16-17199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEESA JACOBSON and PETER RAGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, UNITED STATES OFFICE OF BORDER PATROL and others
Reza Saenz et al v. Fisher Container Corp et al
as 1:2016cv09939
Plaintiff:
Martha Cecilia Reza Saenz , Veronica Reza Saenz , Jose Raymundo Moran Castillo and others
Defendant:
Fisher Container Corp and Michael D Fisher
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WILSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al
as 1:2016cv01580
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, WALMART and others
Plaintiff:
RORY CAVANAUGH WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher v. USA
as 5:2016cv00238
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fisher v. Wells Fargo
as 4:2016cv00394
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Fisher
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank N.A
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America, ex rel Michael J. Fisher v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2016cv00395
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel Michael J. Fisher, Michael J. Fisher, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Fisher v. Schweitzer et al
as 1:2016cv00604
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Fisher
Defendant:
Schweitzer and L Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher v. Cataldi et al
as 1:2016cv00605
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Fisher
Defendant:
Cataldi and Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
