Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Kevin Bromwell, et al v. George Lombardi, et al
as 13-1123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin Bromwell, Billy Turner, Roger Dale Merchant and others
Defendant - Appellee:
George Lombardi, Director MO Dept of Corrections and Jeremiah Nixon, Governor
Bromwell et al v. Lombardi et al
as 4:2012cv01306
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bromwell, Billy Turner, Roger D Merchant and others
Defendant:
George Lombardi and Jeremiah Nixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Lewis v. Gretna Police Department et al
as 2:2009cv07468
Plaintiff:
Neldon Lewis
Defendant:
Gretna Police Department and Arthur S Lawson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOWMAN v. ALLIEDSIGNAL et al
as 2:2009cv68924
Plaintiff:
NELDON J. BOWMAN and NELDON J. BOWMAN
Defendant:
ALLIEDSIGNAL, ALLIEDSIGNAL, ALLIEDSIGNAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Blackmore v. Neldon et al
as 5:2009cv00058
Plaintiff:
Alonzo D. Blackmore
Defendant:
Thomas P. Neldon, Arthur Lawler, Michael Green and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Neldon Neal v. Jeremiah Nixon, et al
as 09-1560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Neldon Neal
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeremiah Nixon, Brenda Umstattd and Paul Harper
United States v. Neldon Neal
as 08-2998
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Neldon Neal
Neal v. Watson et al
as 6:2008cv03028
Plaintiff:
Neldon Harrison Neal
Defendant:
Carl Watson and Houston Herald Newspaper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Nixon, et al
as 2:2007cv04251
Plaintiff:
Neldon Neal
Defendant:
Jeremiah Nixon, Brenda Umstattd and Paul Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
