Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Whitfield v. Elwood et al
as 1:2012cv10371
Plaintiff:
Davionne Whitfield
Defendant:
Sgt. Elwood, Officer Coleman, Officer Coleman #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinn v. Boyd et al(INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00601
Plaintiff:
William Quinn
Defendant:
Louis Boyd, Carter F. Davenport, Sgt. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Hagene et al
as 3:2012cv00179
Plaintiff:
Keith A. West
Defendant:
E. Hagene, Counseior Lutz, Randy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Fallen et al
as 0:2012cv00304
Plaintiff:
Dontay Markeith Wells
Defendant:
D Fallen, C Collie, K Vining and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chester v. Williams et al
as 1:2012cv00189
Plaintiff:
Adrian Chester
Defendant:
Officer Williams, Officer Coleman, James Coe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winford Bryant v. Donald Gaetz, et al
as 12-1060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WINFORD BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD GAETZ, OFFICER TODARO, #4133 Officer at Menard Correctional Center, DONALD GISH, Lieutenant at Pontiac Correctional Center and others
Walker v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv05321
Plaintiff:
Kamal Shane Walker
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Officer Ervin, Officer Bergen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Locklear v. Hubbard et al
as 5:2011ct03094
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Locklear
Defendant:
Mr. Hubbard, Dean Locklear, Eric Locklear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haywood v. Rednor et al
as 3:2011cv00388
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Defendant:
Warden Rednor, Officer Coleman, Officer Matt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonds et al v. Griffin et al
as 1:2011cv03101
Plaintiff:
Cordell Edmonds and Jesus Poppel
Defendant:
Officer Griffin, Officer Coleman, Village of Dolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
