Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Robert Gordon v. USA
as 14-3318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT P. GORDON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Robert P. Gordon
as 14-2744
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT P. GORDON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
Payne et al v. Pummill et al
as 2:2013cv01172
Plaintiff:
Lowell N. Payne, Clifford L. Rucker, James Robinson and others
Defendant:
Cathy Pummill, Jane Doe Park, Amy Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
as 1:2013cv00162
Plaintiff:
Suzanne P. Gordon
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BYAM v. GORDON
as 2:2012cv04257
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN M. BYAM
Defendant:
MICHAEL P. GORDON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc et al
as 1:2012dp21570
Plaintiff:
David P. Gordon, Jr.
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laird et al v. BP p.l.c. et al
as 2:2012cv00792
Plaintiff:
Clyde Warren Laird , Bruce W. Alexander , Raffael R. Anderson and others
Defendant:
BP p.l.c., BP Exploration and Production, Inc., BP America Production Company and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Gordon et al v. Bank of New York Mellon Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
Gerald P Gordon and Tahara D Gordon
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, Safeguard Properties LLC and John Doe Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Norton v. Ludeman et al
as 0:2012cv00440
Plaintiff:
Russell Norton
Defendant:
Cal R. Ludeman, Lucinda Jesson, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon et al v. Mount Yale Investment Advisors, LLC, et al
as 1:2010cv03166
Plaintiff:
David P. Gordon , Jerome Silber , Michelle Behrend Gift Trust and others
Defendant:
Mount Yale Investment Advisors, LLC , Lincoln Financial Advisors Corp. and Siller and Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
