Cases 31 - 40 of 2,124
Pugh v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Damien Deshawn Pugh
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pugh v. Baysore
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Anthony Joel Pugh
Defendant:
Warden Baysore
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pugh v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Pugh
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc., Exactech US, Inc., TPG, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edwards v. Latona et al
as 6:2023cv06735
Plaintiff:
Clint Edwards
Defendant:
Superintendent L. Latona, Poff, Lieutenant Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Saari v. Jesse Pugh, Warden
as 23-3728
Petitioner:
Joseph Thomas Saari
Respondent:
Jesse Pugh, Warden of MCF--Rush City
PUGH v. MIMS
as 4:2023cv00201
Petitioner:
OTIS WADE PUGH, SR
Respondent:
Warden CHARLES MIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ronald Pugh v. Valmont Industries Inc
as 23-3072
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD PUGH
Defendant / Appellee:
VALMONT INDUSTRIES INC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Wilding v. Scranton CCC Center (SDTP) et al
as 3:2023cv01879
Plaintiff:
Shawn Wilding
Defendant:
Scranton CCC Center (SDTP), Scranton GEO, Jeffrey James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pugh v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv05997
Plaintiff:
Luke Pugh
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
