Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2017cv01377
Plaintiff:
Patrick S. Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv04896
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Patrick Anthony Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Anthony Basile, et al v. Pershing Square Capital Mgmt., et al
as 17-80046
Plaintiff - Respondent:
ANTHONY BASILE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and PATRICK T. JOHNSON
Defendant - Petitioner:
PERSHING SQUARE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P., PS MANAGEMENT, GP, LLC, PS FUND 1, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00506
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
La Patrick Johnson v. Fred Foulk
as 14-71393
Petitioner:
LA PATRICK A. JOHNSON
Respondent:
FRED FOULK, Warden
La Patrick Johnson v. Fred Foulk, et al
as 14-15949
Petitioner - Appellant:
LA PATRICK A. JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
FRED FOULK, Warden and RON BARNES, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis, et al. v. Youngblood, et al.
as 2:2014cv00044
Plaintiff:
Donald Gene Davis, Jr. and Sibley Wayne Ard
Defendant:
Stephen Youngblood, David Rainey , Patrick K. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Youngblood et al
as 2:2013cv00880
Plaintiff:
Stacy Harris
Defendant:
Stephen Youngblood, David Rainey, Patrick K. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARMSTRONG et al v. BERRY et al
as 1:2013cv00392
Plaintiff:
GEORGE R. ARMSTRONG , BARRY A. BALDWIN , MARK D. DILLOW and others
Defendant:
JOHN BERRY, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
