Cases 31 - 40 of 99
SRINIVASAN v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv01014
Plaintiff:
SRIDHARAN SRINIVASAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, JONATHAN SCHARFEN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Kamlesh Patel v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 08-1634
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMLESH PATEL, A98-037-362
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General of the United States, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Ramalingam v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008mc00036
Plaintiff:
Jothilingam Ramalingam
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Paul E. Novak and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Xue, et al v. Chertoff, et al
as 3:2008cv00020
Plaintiff:
Yuming Xue and Ningning Wang
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey, Emelio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JEE v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2008cv00552
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD A. GULL JEE
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, ROBERT S. MUELLER, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
El Kotel v. Novak et al
as 1:2008cv00304
Plaintiff:
Chokri El Kotel
Defendant:
Paul E. Novak, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SAEED et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv01294
Plaintiff:
TAHIR SAEED, NAILA SAEED and DANYALL SAEED
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, MICHAEL L. AYTES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
