Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Gaines v. USA
as 2:2012cv01103
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jamie R. Gaines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GAINES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv01481
Plaintiff:
ALDOLPHUS R. GAINES
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Matthews-Gains, et al.
as 2:2012cv12131
Plaintiff:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Enyka Matthews-Gaines and Rico R Gaines
Counter_defendant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Counter_claimant:
Rico R Gaines and Enyka Matthews-Gaines
Gaines v. Hartley et al
as 1:2012cv00715
Plaintiff:
R Gaines
Defendant:
James D. Hartley, Mike Paddock and Charles Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levin v. Bank of New York
as 11-623
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeremy Levin and Lucille Levin
Defendant / Appellee:
Bank of New York, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Societe Generale Corporate & Investment Banking and others
Gaines v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00952
Plaintiff:
Claude R. Gaines, Jr.
Defendant:
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. , John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Levin et al v. Bank of New York et al
as 11-623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jeremy Levin and Lucille Levin
Defendant - Appellee:
Bank of New York, JP Morgan Chase, Societe Generale and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01955
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund et al
as 4:2008cv01383
Plaintiff:
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Brandon Flinn, Raymond Linehan and others
Defendant:
Dirtbusters, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
