Cases 31 - 40 of 373
BAILEY v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2021cv02517
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. BAILEY, JR.
Defendant:
R. YOUNG, CHANDLER and PIKE TOWNSHIP AMBULANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Evans v. Warden Howard R Young Correcti, et al
as 21-2287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EVANS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN HOWARD R YOUNG CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
McGriff v. Delaware Department of Correction et al
as 1:2021cv00996
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. McGriff
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Correction, Howard R. Young Correctional Institution and C/O Bucknor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2021cv00268
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. BAILEY, JR.
Defendant:
R. YOUNG, CHANDLER and PIKE TOWNSHIP AMBULANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Monroe v. C/O Nunn, et al
as 21-2218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES T. MONROE
Defendant / Appellee:
HOWARD R YOUNG CORRECTIONAL CENTER ADMINISTRATION AND STAFF, DR. AUGUST and C/O NUNN
Robert Emery, Jr. v. Mark Nooth, et al
as 21-35278
Defendant / Appellee:
A. EYNON, Grievance Coordinator, TRCI, MARK NOOTH, Eastside Institutions Administator, Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC), HEEHN, Captain; Security Operations, TRCI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LEE EMERY, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02052
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
HESTER v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2021cv00639
Defendant:
DONALD C. MCCORMICK, CARLTON M. HADDEN, BRAD BAUDEK and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. United States of America
as 4:2021cv00060
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Isaac R. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
George YoungIn re: George Young
as 21-3040
Respondent:
KEITH FOLEY
Petitioner:
In re: GEORGE R. YOUNG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
