Cases 31 - 40 of 47
GREEN, ET AL. V. MASON, ET AL.
as 1:2013cv00664
Plaintiff:
KING RAYMOND GREEN , HAROLD WINLEY and ORIGINAL CLOVERS FEATURING HAROLD WINLEY
Defendant:
JOHNNY MASON, CHARLES R. STEVENS and CLOVERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Ronald Green v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-10746
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD RAYMOND GREEN
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Green v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv02019
Plaintiff:
Raymond Green
Defendant:
The City of New York , Betzayda Fraticelli and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Green v. Burl Cain, Warden
as 11-30952
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND GREEN
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
US v. Paul Green
as 11-6278
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PAUL RAYMOND GREEN
Green v. United States of America
as 8:2010cv02749
Petitioner:
Paul Raymond Green
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Green v. Louisiana State Penitentiary
as 1:2010cv00841
Plaintiff:
Raymond Green
Defendant:
Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Raymond Green v. Ben Curry, et al
as 10-16109
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND GREEN
Respondent - Appellee:
BEN CURRY, Warden, SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA
Simmons et al v. Recreation By Design, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv06417
Plaintiff:
John Erskine, John Erskine, John Erskine and others
Defendant:
Recreation By Design, LLC, Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Green v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2009cv00215
Petitioner:
Ronald Raymond Green
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
