Cases 31 - 40 of 64
LOBERGER et al v. DEL-JEN INC et al
as 5:2013cv00299
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MILLER and RICHARD LOBERGER
Defendant:
DEL-JEN INC and J&J MAINTENANCE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Ball et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03053
Plaintiff:
Melissa Ball , Zeddra Bayley , Ruby Crotts and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ball et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as CAN/4:13-cv-03053
Plaintiff:
Melissa Ball , Zeddra Bayley , Ruby Crotts and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
USA v. Raymond Miller
as 13-3206
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAYMOND MILLER
USA v. Raymond Miller
as 13-3206
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RAYMOND MILLER
Amicus Curiae:
THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS, AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS and others
Miller v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
as 1:2012cv24092
Plaintiff:
Raymond Miller
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Miller, II v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv01044
Petitioner:
William Raymond Miller, II
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MILLER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2010cv00917
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MILLER
Defendant:
WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT and BE-WENZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Verser v. Turner et al
as 1:2010cv07451
Plaintiff:
Glenn Verser
Defendant:
Leslie Turner, Raymond Miller, Terry McCann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER et al v. THAYER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv00307
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MILLER and CHRISTINE MILLER
Defendant:
THAYER CORPORATION and PIT STOP FUELS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
