Cases 31 - 40 of 133
Adams v. Greene et al
as 1:2021cv02835
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Kwame Y Raoul, Greene and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHRISTOPHER-VARRICCHIO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv20637
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHRISTOPHER-VARRICCHIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Avery v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00578
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Avery
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Robert England
as 21-5273
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT CHRISTOPHER ENGLAND
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Adams v. Dupont et al
as 2:2021cv01121
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams
Defendant:
Edward Wallace, Scanning Western IL and Dupont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carpezzi v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 2:2021cv00180
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Carpezzi
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Alaji v. City of Niagara Falls
as 21-250
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Tammy L. Smeal-Jackson, Candice Renee Hill-Ridgeway, Terry Duane Spencer and others
Defendant / Appellant:
City of Niagara Falls, CECOS International, Inc., Conestoga-Rovers & Associates and others
KMETZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv89665
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHRISTOPHER KMETZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christophel v. Dugan et al
as 2:2020cv01302
Defendant:
Karen Loebel and Timothy Dugan
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher and Robert Michael Christophel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv81527
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
