Cases 31 - 40 of 2,775
Lewis v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01352
Plaintiff:
Sammy Lewis
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Joshua Steadman
as 24-5265
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOSHUA SAMMY STEADMAN
USA v. Joshua Steadman
as 24-5266
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOSHUA SAMMY STEADMAN
Johnson v. USA et al
as 7:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Johnson
Defendant:
Sammie Gibson, D.O., Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc. doing business as Highlands Regional ARH doing business as Hazard ARH, Big Sandy Health Care, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Gilstrap v. Fulton County Court Clerks Office
as 1:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
Sammy E Gilstrap and Sammy E. Gilstrap
Defendant:
Fulton County Court Clerks Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilstrap v. Fulton County Marshal Dept.
as 1:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
Sammy E Gilstrap and Sammy E. Gilstrap
Defendant:
Fulton County Marshal Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Barreto Quispe, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1436
Petitioner:
JENNIFER ESTHER BARRETO QUISPE, BILLY MARTIN RUIZ MARTINEZ, JENNDAO JEYKO CHATA BARRETO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Moser v. The Halifax County, VA, Board of Supervisors et al
as 4:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Sammie Todd Moser
Defendant:
The Halifax County, VA, Board of Supervisors and The Virginia Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carpenter v. Stearns
as 1:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Sammy Lee Carpenter, III
Defendant:
Warden Stearns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
