Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Ricky Bell v. R.C. Scholtz, et al
as 11-1961
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICKY BELL
Defendant - Appellee: R.C. SCHOLTZ, Doctor, ROGER E. WALKER, JR., MICHAEL PRITCHARD, Lt. #9985 and others
RIPPEY et al v. DEATRICK et al
as 4:2011cv00044
Defendant: ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC., NATHAN WAYNE BANET, MIKE DEATRICK and others
Plaintiff: THE ESTATE OF CRYSTAL THOMPSON and JOHANNA RIPPEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luis Rodriguez v. Kerrh Toyoda, et al
as 11-35060
Plaintiff - Appellant: LUIS A. CAMEJO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant: KERRH TOYODA, AUDRY CHURCH, BRYAN SCHOLTZ and others
Paulino v. Burlington County Jail, et al
as 10-4795
Plaintiff - Appellant: JUAN PAULINO
Defendant - Appellee: BURLINGTON COUNTY JAIL, COLE, WARDEN, ARTIST, ACTING DEPUTY WARDEN and others
Scholtz v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv03794
Plaintiff: Joy Scholtz
Defendant: Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Camejo Rodriguez v. Frakes et al
as 2:2010cv01331
Plaintiff: Luis A. Camejo Rodriguez
Defendant: Scott Frakes, Kerrh Toyoda, Audry Church and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nyenekor v. Scholtz
as 10-3021
Plaintiff - Appellant: Carpeah R. Nyenekor, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee: Brendon Scholtz, Howard Leibovitch, The Commissioner and others
Camejo Rodriguez v. Frakes et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv22542
Plaintiff: Luis A. Camejo Rodriguez
Defendant: Scott Frakes, Kerrh Toyoda, Audry Church and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHOLTZ v. ZIMMER, INC.
as 2:2010cv03719
Plaintiff: SUSAN SCHOLTZ
Defendant: ZIMMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nyenekor v. Scholtz et al
as 1:2010cv03279
Plaintiff: Carpeah R. Nyenekor, Sr.
Defendant: Brendon Scholtz, Howard Leibovitch, The Commissioner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?