Cases 31 - 40 of 110
Hughes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01613
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lee Hughes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hummel v. Saul
as 4:2020cv01636
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lee Hummel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Paxton v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00262
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Shannon Lee Paxton
Interested Party:
Gerald Feuerhelm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Durham v. Stein
as 3:2020cv00452
Respondent:
Josh Stein
Petitioner:
Shannon Lee Durham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOEHM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv40122
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHANNON LEE BOEHM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv18434
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHANNON LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Black Lives Matter Los Angeles et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 2:2020cv05027
Defendant:
Chief Michel Moore, City of Los Angeles and Does 1-10 inclusive
Plaintiff:
Linus Shentu, Black Lives Matter Los Angeles, Weston Rowland and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Richard T. Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv10497
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHANNON LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GORDON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv96142
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHANNON LEE GORDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blea v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv00342
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lee Blea
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
