Cases 31 - 40 of 1,173
Spaxel Spaulding, LLC v. Hassan
as 1:2023cv02622
Plaintiff:
Spaxel Spaulding, LLC doing business as Spaulding Hills
Defendant:
Tanya Hassan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
LLOYD v. MANBEL DEVCO I LP et al
as 5:2023cv02261
Plaintiff:
SUSAN LLOYD
Defendant:
MANBEL DEVCO I LP, MANBEL DEVCO III LP doing business as ECLIPSE AT BELMONT, AUDREY CALECA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Sutton et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2023cv02607
Plaintiff:
Anita Edra Sutton, Brent Krichevsky, Brett M. Crowe and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Spaulding v. Salih et al
as 3:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Spaulding
Defendant:
Ali Salih and Hakir Transport LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Perficient, Inc. v. Thomas Munley
as 23-2131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Perficient, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Thomas Munley
Defendant:
Spaulding Ridge, LLC
Spaulding v. Estrada et al
as 2:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Aaron Spaulding
Defendant:
Johnny Estrada, Manuel Frias, Daniel Benoit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Perficient, Inc. v. Thomas Munley
as 23-1923
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Perficient, Inc.
Defendant / Appellant:
Thomas Munley
Defendant:
Spaulding Ridge, LLC
Scott Miller, et al v. Kshama Sawant, et al
as 23-35197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT MILLER, an individual and MICHAEL SPAULDING, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
KSHAMA SAWANT, an individual
Defendant:
CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation
Brown v. Spaulding
as 3:2023cv00382
Petitioner:
Shawnta L. Brown
Respondent:
Warden Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SPAULDING v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04730
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN TAYLOR SPAULDING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
