Cases 31 - 40 of 1,208
David Peasley v. M. Spearman, et al
as 23-15471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SCOTT PEASLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, Warden, D. BRIGHT, Chief Medical Officer, ZAHED AHMED, Doctor and others
SPEARMAN v. VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
as 2:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
RAPHAEL SPEARMAN
Defendant:
VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jorge Herrera v. M. Spearman
as 23-55169
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORGE LUIS HERRERA
Respondent / Appellee:
M. E. SPEARMAN, Warden
Paul Johnson v. Thuddy, et al
as 23-15167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
THUDDY, MD., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D., L. W. ROHLFING, MD and others
David Peasley v. M. Spearman, et al
as 23-15177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SCOTT PEASLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, Warden, D. BRIGHT, Chief Medical Officer, ZAHED AHMED, Doctor and others
United States of America v. Spearman
as 4:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kenderick Spearman
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Fidel Soto v. M. Spearman
as 23-15258
Petitioner / Appellant:
FIDEL ALCANTAR SOTO
Respondent / Appellee:
M. E. SPEARMAN
(PC) Spearman v. Hillberg et al
as 2:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Reginald E. Spearman
Defendant:
Ronald W. Hillberg, Mark E. Prescott, N. Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spearman v. Ajanta Pharma USA Inc et al
as 3:2023cv16757
Plaintiff:
Annette Spearman
Defendant:
Ajanta Pharma USA Inc, Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stewart v. Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center et al
as 5:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
George Stewart
Defendant:
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lori Rice-Spearman, Steven Lee Berk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
