Cases 31 - 40 of 74,670
Webb v. Quintairos, Prieto, Boyer & Wood, P.A. et al
as 1:2024cv04082
Plaintiff:
John Webb
Defendant:
Quintairos, Prieto, Boyer & Wood, P.A., Maxson Mago & Macaulay, LLP, Anthony Schumann and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tracy v. Nall et al
as 4:2024cv04092
Plaintiff:
Steven Tracy, Jr
Defendant:
. Nall and East Moline Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keener v. Cork et al
as 1:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Keener
Defendant:
Melanie Cork, Samuel Keirns, Ashley Skibinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02503
Plaintiff:
Steven Ross
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dalton v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02528
Plaintiff:
Steven Dalton
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Schurman v. Luke
as 4:2024cv04100
Petitioner:
Stephanie Amanda Schurman
Respondent:
Steven Luke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stevens v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02552
Plaintiff:
Charles Thomas Stevens
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STRIPLIN v. WRAY et al
as 1:2024cv01437
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, KAMALA D. HARRIS, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and others
Crosby et al v. City of Titusville, Florida et al
as 6:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
Natasha Crosby and Peter Crosby
Defendant:
City of Titusville, Florida and Steven Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
