Cases 31 - 40 of 787
Alphonza Thomas-Bey v. John Stine
as 23-6764
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALPHONZA LEONARD PHILLIP THOMAS, III, a/k/a Alphonza L.P. Thomas-Bey
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN STINE
LIPTOK v. CITY OF POTTSVILLE PA., ET AL
as 2:2023cv02942
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. LIPTOK
Defendant:
CITY OF POTTSVILLE PA., ET AL, CITY COUNCIL, DOROTHY BOTTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stine v. Fragoso et al
as 4:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
R Fragoso, J Coyle, M Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stine v. Coyle et al
as 4:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
J Coyle, S Karlan, E Alcantar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
STINE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18679
Plaintiff:
SHAWN STINE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Jesse Stines, Jr.
as 23-4444
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JESSE BERNALE STINES, JR., a/k/a Shyne
Brown et al v. Dolbin et al
as 3:2023cv01040
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Brown and A. M. B.
Defendant:
Cyrus Palmer Dolbin, Mark A. Barket, Karen E. Rismiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stine v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
United States of America, Colette Peters, M Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
STINES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14311
Plaintiff:
STEPHINE STINES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stine v. Gutierrez
as 4:2023cv00249
Petitioner:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Respondent:
M Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
