Cases 31 - 40 of 3,672
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02588
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Kush v. Dickson et al
as 2:2024cv00639
Defendant:
Sydnee Dickson, U.S. Department of Education, AT and T Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Remy Kush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Saadat Nejad v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv01519
Defendant:
Superior Court of California, Best Buy, Amber Paloma Noriega Del Cid and others
Plaintiff:
Shahrokh S. Nejad, Shahrokh SaadatNejad, Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
SCHULTE v. AT&T, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv07818
Plaintiff:
CHRIS SCHULTE
Defendant:
AT&T INC. and AT&T MOBILITY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Surowiec v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 1:2024cv22619
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff:
Carol Surowiec
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Moore v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv04915
Defendant:
Darren T. Moore, Nathan Lee, JP Morgan Chase Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Alicia Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Petroski v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00090
Defendant:
Snowflake, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alex Petroski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
David Sifuentes, III v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 24-1617
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES, III
Defendant:
AT&T MOBILITY, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
LEON et al v. AT&T INC. et al
as 1:2024cv02397
Plaintiff:
RICHARD INZA, MICHAEL INZA and RAY LEON
Defendant:
STEPHEN J LUCZO, WILLIAM E. KENNARD, JOHN STANKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
