Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Cataldo v. TD Bank, National Association
as 1:2019cv22088
Defendant:
TD Bank, National Association
Plaintiff:
Donato Ramaglia Cataldo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00670
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
U.S. Bank National Association v. TD Bank National Association
as 1:2018cv15383
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
TD Bank National Association
Plaintiff:
U.S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
3Rd Party Defendant:
Sugar HIll DC LLC and Robert H Feaster, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Bank Trust N.A. as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. Hilse et al
as 1:2018cv12226
Defendant:
TD Bank National Association, Santander Bank N.A. and Doreen C. Hilse
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank Trust N.A. as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moog Marketing, Inc. v. TD Bank, National Association
as 6:2018cv01765
Plaintiff:
MOOG MARKETING, INC.
Defendant:
TD Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Bank National Association v. TD Bank National Association
as 0:2018cv02630
Defendant:
TD Bank National Association
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rutan v. TD Bank, National Association
as 8:2018cv01476
Plaintiff:
Larry J. Rutan
Defendant:
TD Bank, National Association
Mediator:
Peter J. Grilli
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00462
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
