Cases 31 - 40 of 51
LUEVANO v. PERRY et al
as 2:2012cv05602
Petitioner:
JAIME LUEVANO
Respondent:
RICK PERRY, GREG ABBOTT, TEXAS SUPREME COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wyttenbach v. Parish et al
as 3:2012cv00386
Petitioner:
William Hayes Wyttenbach
Appellee:
Ranita Marie Parish
Respondent:
Texas Supreme Court, Court of Appeals 13th District of Texas, Banales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Senior v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2012cv00298
Plaintiff:
Warren R Senior, Jr
Defendant:
The State of Texas, The Texas Supreme Court of Texas, The Court of Appeals First District of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3613
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
William Wyttenbach v. Texas Supreme Court, et al
as 11-6012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HAYES WYTTENBACH
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS SUPREME COURT, RANITA MARIE PARISH, COURT OF APPEALS 13TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS and others
Jaime Luevano v. G. Patrick Murphy, et al
as 11-2769
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAIME LUEVANO
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK G. MURPHY, U.S. District Judge, SEVEN CIRCUIT JUDGES - CLERKS, TEXAS STATE BAR IN GENERAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv02045
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Jaime Luevano v. Rick Penny et al
as 2:2011cv05514
Defendant:
Texas Atty General Greg Abbott, Texas Gov Rick Penny and Texas Supreme Court
Plaintiff:
Jaime Luevano
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv50176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Luevano v. Perry et al
as 1:2011cv00541
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevano
Respondent:
Rick Perry, Greg Abbott and Texas Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
