Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Ferran v. Office of the District Attorne
as 13-3156
Plaintiff - Appellant: Mark R. Ferran and Nadia Ferran
Defendant - Appellee: Office of the District Attorney of the County of Rensselaer, Kenneth R. Bruno, in his individual and official capacity, Rensselaer County and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01018
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pasinella et al v. The County of Rensselaer et al
as 1:2013cv00607
Plaintiff: Dominic Pasinella and Marjorie Pasinella
Defendant: The County of Rensselaer , Jack Mahar , Ron LaFountain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Talukder v. County of Rensselaer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01765
Plaintiff: Michael K. Talukder
Defendant: County of Rensselaer, City of Troy, City of Troy Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McColley v. County of Rensselaer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2220
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee: Ronita McColley
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant: County of Rensselaer
Defendant: Moe Doe, Troy Police Officers whose true names are presently unknown, Individually and as agents, servants and/or employees of the City of Troy, Joe Doe, Troy Police Officers whose true names are presently unknown, Individually and as agents, servants and/or employees of the City of Troy and City of Troy
Defendant - Appellant: Michael Riley, Investigator, Individually and as agent, servant and/or employee of the County of Rensselaer
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 12-1067
Plaintiff - Appellee: SHIRLEY GELLER, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA, TWIN CITIES BAKERY WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
: COUNTY OF ORANGE, ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, M. JOYCE HOWE and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF VA, LARRY YOUNG and THERESE SHEPLEY
Movant - Appellant: CORINNA CONNICK
Defendant - Appellee: BAXTER PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., STANLEY C. HOPKINS, MONSANTO COMPANY and others
Defendant: AGOURON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BIOGEN, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC and others
Interested Party - Appellee: COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE POLICY AND FINANCING, HUMANA, INC., CARDINAL HEALTH, INC. and others
Interested Party: MILBERG LLP, PARMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Ward v. The County of Rensselaer et al
as 1:2012cv00011
Plaintiff: Michael Ward
Defendant: The County of Rensselaer, Keith R. Hancock, Jr., Joseph Angrisano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krug v. County of Rensselaer
as 11-125
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: Robert L. Krug and Bonnie S. Krug
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: City of Troy, Nicholas Kaiser, Asst. Police Chief, John Waters, in his individual and official capacity as Sergeant and others
Defendant-Counter-Claimant: Troy Police Department
Defendant: County of Rensselaer and Cieplik, FBI Special Agent
Quattlebaum v. Corrections Officer McDonald et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01143
Plaintiff: Charles Quattlebaum
Defendant: Corrections Officer McDonald, Harold Smith, Robert Loveridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forjone v. The State of California
as 10-822
Plaintiff: Wayne Mack, Dan DelPlato, Jr., Gabriel Razzano and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: John-Joseph Forjone, the 42 USC 1983/Bivens/False Claims Act matter effecting the statewide distribution of HAVA funds requiring a 28 USC 2284 panel effecting New York Municipal People's equity in Bottom-up suffrage. Homerule autonomy and effecting real p
Defendant - Appellee: The State of California, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of Oregon, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of New Mexico, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?