Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Hermosillo et al v. Davey Tree Surgery Company et al
as 3:2018cv00393
Plaintiff:
Jose Diaz Hermosillo and Oscar Diaz Hermosillo
Defendant:
Davey Tree Surgery Company and The Davey Tree Expert Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
500 Minoel LLC v. The Davey Tree Expert Company
as 7:2017cv09945
Plaintiff:
500 Minoel LLC
Defendant:
The Davey Tree Expert Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meek v. The Davey Tree Expert Company
as 2:2017cv00174
Plaintiff:
Mary Jo Meek
Defendant:
The Davey Tree Expert Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CONWAY v. DAVEY TREE EXPERT COMPANY
as 3:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
JOEL C. CONWAY
Defendant:
DAVEY TREE EXPERT COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-14604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
George Lutfi v. US
as 11-1966
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE LUTFI
Defendant - Appellee:
INTEGRITY NATIONAL CORPORATION, JOHN DOW COMPANY, and all persons providing services related to maintenance, construction or lighting or the parking lot designated for visitors to the US Air Force Monument between 9/1/06 and 12/31/06 and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BALFOUR BEATTY, LLC, CENTEX CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INCORPORATED, DAVEY TREE EXPERT COMPANY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
