Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Chalco v. Belair
as 17-1879
Plaintiff - Appellee: Rene Chalco
Defendant: Christopher Belair
Defendant - Appellant: Robert Madore, Ryan Howley and Andrew Katkocin
Chalco v. Belair
as 17-1873
Plaintiff - Appellee: Rene Chalco
Defendant - Appellant: Christopher Belair, Robert Madore, Ryan Howley and others
Madore v. Semple et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00129
Plaintiff: Roland Madore
Defendant: Scott Semple, Gary Freston, Monica Faranella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chanel, Inc. v. Jhonshop.com et al
as 0:2016cv62717
Plaintiff: Chanel, Inc.
Defendant: Jhonshop.com, Nixocase.com, artheta.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
US v. Madore
as 16-2295
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: JACKIE MADORE
Stile v. Somerset County, et al
as 16-2151
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES STILE
Defendant - Appellee: HERRERA, Corrections Officer, PIKE, Corrections Officer, SOMERSET COUNTY and others
Defendant: STATE OF MAINE, MAINE STATE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, POULIN, Corrections Officer and others
Madore v. Navy Federal Credit Union et al
as 3:2016cv02308
Plaintiff: Connie Madore
Defendant: Navy Federal Credit Union , Bank of America, N.A. , Monterey Financial Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Madore v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service et al
as 3:2016cv02310
Plaintiff: Ronnie Madore
Defendant: Army and Air Force Exchange Service , Bank of America, N.A. , Monterey Financial Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
MADORE v. WP GLIMCHER, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01203
Plaintiff: SHARON MADORE
Defendant: WP GLIMCHER, INC. and Darden Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Madore v. WP Glimcher, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01203
Plaintiff: Sharon Madore
Defendant: WP Glimcher, Inc. and Darden Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?