Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Valle v. Rogers et al
as 1:2014cv00100
Plaintiff:
Jesus Valle
Defendant:
Rusty Rogers, Tommy Ramos, Thomas Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Myers v. Larry Smalls, et al
as 13-56864
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM THOMAS MYERS
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY SMALLS, Warden, JAMES TILTON, Director of the CA Department of Corrections, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
KAPP et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv04575
Plaintiff:
JOE KAPP , PAUL LOWE , CRAIG COTTON and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES LLC , RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Joe Kapp et al v. National Football League et al
as 2:2012cv05833
Defendant:
All American Sports Corporation, EB Sports Corp., Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Anderson, Sr., Joseph Beauchamp, David Cadigan and others
Arata et al v. BP America Production Company et al
as 2:2011cv02530
Plaintiff:
John Arata , Southern Sports Fishing, Inc. , Larry Scott and others
Defendant:
BP America Production Company , Parsons Corporation , Danos & Curole Staffing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1333
William Myers v. United States Marshals Service, et al
as 11-56479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM THOMAS MYERS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and UNKNOWN EMPLOYEE OF THE US MARSHALS SERVICE
Arata et al v. BP America Production Company et al
as 1:2011cv00274
Defendant:
BP America Production Company , Parsons Corporation , Dennis Berg and others
Plaintiff:
John Arata , Southern Sports Fishing, Inc. , Larry Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
William Myers v. US Marshals Service
as 11-55840
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM THOMAS MYERS
Defendant - Appellee:
US MARSHALS SERVICE
Myers v. USA
as 5:2011cv00181
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gregory Thomas Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
