Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Eugene Holmes v. Dayna Causby
as 14-2011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE T. HOLMES, a/k/a Eugene "Sherlock" Holmes
Defendant - Appellee:
DAYNA CAUSBY, Director, Board of Elections, DANIEL C. AYSCUE, President, Alliance Bank & Trust, GREGORY MCINTYRE, Attorney and others
Holmes v. Causby et al
as 1:2014cv00241
Plaintiff:
Eugene T. Holmes
Defendant:
Dayna Causby, Daniel C. Ayscue, Gregory McIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Moore et al
as 1:2014cv00084
Plaintiff:
Eugene T. Holmes
Defendant:
Tim Moore, Gregory S. McIntyre, David Teddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
503) 988-3377 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Salemi v. Colorado Public Employees' Retirement Association et al
as 1:2013cv02826
Plaintiff:
Elham Salemi
Defendant:
Colorado Public Employees' Retirement Association , Tim Moore and Angela Setter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Elliot v. Staton et al
as 3:2011cv01536
Plaintiff:
Brett Elliot
Defendant:
Carol Hasler, John Does 1 - 10, Tim Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MOBLEY v. MOORE
as 4:2011cv00270
Plaintiff:
RAY CHRIS MOBLEY
Defendant:
JAMES TIM MOORE, GUY TUNNELL, TOMMY FORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. CIA et al
as 1:2010cv00948
Plaintiff:
FARAUD K. MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
CIA, TIM MOORE, GENERAL SERGEANT TO THE CIA IN ILLINOIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saffold v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2007cv00598
Plaintiff:
Janice Caldwell
Defendant:
Tim Moore and Kmart Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Owens v. Polk County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2009cv00511
Plaintiff:
Daniel Owens
Defendant:
Polk County Sheriff Department, Donna Johnson and Tim Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.