Cases 31 - 40 of 231
(PC) Tunstall v. Ghaly et al
as 2:2021cv01578
Plaintiff:
Robert William Tunstall, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark Ghaly, Gavin Newsom and Internal Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tunstall v. Daigle
as 21-30510
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas T. Tunstall, V and Thomas Tate Tunstall
Defendant / Appellee:
Hope Daigle, formerly known as Hope D. Theriot
PERRONG v. SUPPORT AMERICAN LEADERS PAC et al
as 2:2021cv03263
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. PERRONG
Defendant:
SUPPORT AMERICAN LEADERS PAC, MATTHEW TUNSTALL and CAMPAIGN TO SUPPORT TO PRESIDENT PAC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Thomas Tunstall v. Kelley Edwards, et al
as 21-11613
Defendant / Appellee:
KELLEY O. EDWARDS, In her individual and official capacities and CYNTHIA T. MOSLEY, In her individual and official capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS T. TUNSTALL
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Tunstall v. Mnuchin et al
as 7:2021cv00254
Defendant:
Charles Rettig, The U.S. Internal Revenue Service, Steven Mnuchin and others
Plaintiff:
Theodore Tunstall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brooks v. Mnuchin et al
as 7:2021cv00223
Defendant:
Charles Rettig, The U.S. Internal Revenue Service, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Vernon Brooks, Jr., Tyrone Roads, Lamont Jefferson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ayers v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00478
Defendant:
Gaines, Watts, Tunstall and others
Plaintiff:
Jaunes Ayers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sales v. Sanders et al
as 2:2021cv00388
Defendant:
R Gain, Lt Carl Sanders, K Petters and others
Plaintiff:
James William Sales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dees v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00371
Defendant:
Steward Shaw, Officer A. Johnson, Officer Terrell and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dennis Dees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
