Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Cofield v. Mentzell et al
as 1:2012cv01316
Plaintiff:
Keenan K. Cofield
Defendant:
Mr. Mentzell, Balt. Co. Circuit Court, Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collier v. Attorney General of the State of Illinois et al
as 3:2011cv00807
Petitioner:
Artimus A Collier
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Illinois and U S Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wixom v. U S Marshals Service et al
as 4:2011cv00318
Petitioner:
Roswell William Wixom, Sr
Respondent:
U S Marshals Service and Polk County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perales v. U.S. Marshal Service, et al
as 2:2011cv01621
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
U S Marshals Service, Central Intelligence Agency, Stacia Hylton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Collier v. U S Marshals Service et al
as 3:2010cv00889
Petitioner:
Artimus A. Collier
Respondent:
U S Marshals Service and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Collier v. U S Marshals Service et al
as 3:2010cv00888
Petitioner:
Artimus A. Collier
Respondent:
U S Marshals Service and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeter v. Philpot
as 1:2010cv02105
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Trimane Jeter
Defendant:
Warden - Atlanta, Bureau of Prisons, Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Knox County Jail et al
as 4:2009cv00428
Plaintiff:
Anthony N. Smith
Defendant:
Knox County Jail and U S Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHABBAN v. U. S. MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 1:2009cv00927
Plaintiff:
KHALED M. RASHAD SHABBAN
Defendant:
U. S. MARSHALS SERVICE, WARDEN and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weatherton v. America's Most Wanted et al
as 3:2009cv00111
Plaintiff:
Bobby Weatherton
Defendant:
America's Most Wanted, Unknown Senior Producers of America's Most Wanted, Karen Daborowski and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
