Cases 31 - 40 of 12,544
Rosales Lopez v. Garland
as 24-1215
Petitioner:
MARLON ORLANDO ROSALES LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sava v. Garland
as 24-1192
Petitioner:
PAMELA SAVA, SALAJAN SAVA and DAVID SAVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bannikov v. Garland
as 24-1202
Petitioner:
PAVEL BANNIKOV, NIKOLAI BANNIKOV, LIUBOV BANNIKOVA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Williams et al v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Antoine-Denard Williams, Sr. and Virginia Loretta Baker
Defendant:
State of Florida, Joseph Biden, United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arraz-Saenz (PS) v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2024cv01238
Petitioner:
Horacio Arraz-Saenz
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Services and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chowdhury v. Garland
as 24-1170
Petitioner:
JAHANGIR CHOWDHURY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kansas, State of et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Kansas, State of, Arkansas, State of, Iowa, State of and others
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Rivera-Cruz v. Garland
as 24-1146
Petitioner:
JENNIFER RIVERA-CRUZ and KEYSHA CRUZ-RIVERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gomes Calixto v. Garland
as 24-1151
Petitioner:
NACIPE GOMES CALIXTO, JULIANA DA SILVA GUEDES and MARIA ALICE GUEDES CALIXTO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
