Cases 31 - 40 of 100
Agut v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 24-1639
Plaintiff:
AGUT DENG AGUT
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER JOYCE, TOM KIMBER, JENNY GONZALEZ and others
Vazquez v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv01314
Plaintiff:
Harold Vazquez
Defendant:
United States of America, John Doe, US Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
US v. Rankins
as 24-1615
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
JAMESA RANKINS
Interested Party:
US POSTAL SERVICE and MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE
Hooks et al v. US Postal Service et al
as 4:2024cv00537
Defendant:
John Doe (4:24-CV-537-O) and US Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Kelly A. Hooks and Jess M. Spray, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Godfrey v. Costner, et al.
as 5:2024cv02547
Plaintiff:
Diane K Godfrey
Defendant:
Kevin Costner, Harrison Ford, Spencer Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1477
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
PRIESTER v. HARRIS et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
DAVID PRIESTER, JAMES THOMAS and DAVID JACKSON
Defendant:
SCOTT S HARRIS, GRANT MALOY, EUGENE GRINBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. US Postal Service et al
as 2:2024cv10869
Plaintiff:
Mileathia Johnson
Defendant:
US Postal Service, Jeffrey Nail and Alfred Washington
Gristi v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 3:2024cv01706
Plaintiff:
Denise Gristi
Defendant:
US Postal Service, United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Boykin v. US Postal Service et al
as 2:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Boykin
Defendant:
US Postal Service and Jarvis Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
