Cases 31 - 40 of 362
Boggis v. City of Moorhead et al
as 0:2022cv02576
Plaintiff:
Todd Boggis
Defendant:
City of Moorhead, Officer J. Hanson, Officer T. Hennen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Michael Van Dyke
as 22-30160
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL THOMAS VAN DYKE
Fekety v. Wellpath et al.
as 4:2022cv01667
Plaintiff:
Linda Fekety
Defendant:
Wellpath, John J. Vargo, D.O., Deputy Hocevar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Settle v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00706
Plaintiff:
Mike Settle
Defendant:
Core Civic, Inc., Billy Hoyle, Ashleigh Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Xu v. BIG BEAVER SS #205, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv12124
Plaintiff:
Nancy Xu
Defendant:
BIG BEAVER SS #205, LLC, FRANCIS ASKER a/k/a FRANK ASKER, Francis Asker and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Van Dyke v. River & Industrial Diving, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
Dennis P Van Dyke
Defendant:
River & Industrial Diving, LLC and Cajun Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688 Jones Act
Bey v. Macomb County et al
as 2:2022cv11308
Plaintiff:
Barak Beni Yisrael Bey and Ryan Robert Mcclain
Defendant:
Macomb County, City of Warren, Warren Police Department and others
Van Dyke Horn, LLC v. Van Dyke et al
as 4:2022cv11141
Plaintiff:
Van Dyke Horn, LLC
Defendant:
Peter Van Dyke, Michael Sherman, Jamie Kaye Walters and others
Hodge v. Van Dyke et al
as 3:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
Maxwell M. Hodge, III
Defendant:
Ashleigh Van Dyke, A. W. Norman, f/n/u Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coyote Logistics, LLC v. Van Dyke Transport, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01221
Plaintiff:
Coyote Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
Van Dyke Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
