Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Williams v. Criminal Justice System
as 10-2606
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jomo Williams
Petitioner:
Those Simarly Situated, Peo. of N.Y.S. and U.S.
Respondent - Appellee:
Criminal Justice System, Radermacher, OFC., Wagner, OFC. and others
Lawyer et al v. Verizon, Inc. et al
as 8:2010cv01287
Plaintiff:
Janice Lawyer , Rebecca Thomas , Melissa Spencer and others
Defendant:
Verizon, Inc. and Verizon Maryland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Chandan Vora v. Ronald Fisher, et al
as 10-1676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHANDAN S. VORA
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD FISHER, COURIER EXPRESS, WESTCO INS and others
Williams v. II Criminal Justice System et al
as 1:2010cv00149
Petitioner:
Jomo Williams
Respondent:
II Criminal Justice System, Radermacher, Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams et al v. Criminal Justice System et al
as 1:2010mc00011
Petitioner:
Jomo Williams, Those Simarly Situated, Peo. of N.Y.S. and others
Respondent:
Criminal Justice System, OFC. Radermacher, OFC. Wagner and others
VORA v. FISHER et al
as 3:2009cv00283
Plaintiff:
CHANDAN S. VORA
Defendant:
RONALD FISHER, COURIER EXPRESS, WESTCO INS. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
VORA v. VERIZON, INC.
as 3:2002cv00082
Plaintiff:
CHANDAN S. VORA
Defendant:
VERIZON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
