Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Wansley v. General Electric Co. et al
as 1:2010gd50020
Plaintiff:
John Wansley, Sr.
Defendant:
General Electric Co., GE Healthcare AS, GE Healthcare Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Land O'Lakes Purina Feed, LLC v. Wansley et al
as 3:2010cv00163
Plaintiff:
Land O'Lakes Purina Feed, LLC
Defendant:
Tandy Wansley and Wansley Land & Cattle, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Harper et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2010cv00134
Plaintiff:
James Harper and Katrina Wansley
Defendant:
Mike Lee, Joe Rifby, Unknown Arresting Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Acker et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07838
Plaintiff:
Eartha Acker, Eartha Acker, Eartha Acker and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WANSLEY et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as PAE/2:09-CV-87946
Plaintiff:
WANSLEY
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC
WANSLEY et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv87946
Plaintiff:
TOMMY WANSLEY and SARAH WANSLEY
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Wansley Hughes v. A.o. Smith, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-78783
Plaintiff:
Wansley Hughes
Defendant:
A.o. Smith
Wansley Hughes v. Abco Industries, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-71819
Plaintiff:
Wansley Hughes
Defendant:
Abco Industries, Inc
Wansley v. King, et al
as 09-60064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFERY W. WANSLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD KING and CHRISTOPHER EPPS
Eddie Wansley, Jr. v. Jim Hall
as 08-57040
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDDIE WANSLEY, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
JIM HALL, Warden, Ironwood State Prison
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
