Cases 31 - 40 of 91
Abadi v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv01897
Defendant:
X Corp., Eric Leroy Adams, The City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Abadi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Agrawal et al v. Musk et al
as 3:2024cv01304
Defendant:
X Corp., Elon Musk, Twitter, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Parag Agrawal, Ned Segal, Vijaya Gadde and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Tatum v. X. Corp. et al
as 7:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tatum
Defendant:
X. Corp., Elon Musk and Jane and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
X CORP., Successor in Interest to TWITTER, INC. v. Bonta
as 24-271
Plaintiff / Appellant:
X CORP., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO TWITTER, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California
Doe 1, et al. v. Twitter, Inc., et al.
as 24-177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC. and X CORP., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO TWITTER, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Naqvi v. X Corp.
as 1:2023cv01777
Plaintiff:
Mr. Yadullah Naqvi and Yadullah Naqvi
Defendant:
X Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
v. Naqvi et al
as 1:2023cv01776
Defendant:
Mr. Yadullah Naqvi and X Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Clark et al v. X Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv05840
Plaintiff:
Tamah Jada Clark and Anti-Semitism Defense League
Defendant:
X Corp., World Jewish Congress and American Israel Public Affairs Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
