Cases 1 - 10 of 86
DB COMMUNICATIONS LLC D/B/A MULTIPLY v. X CORP.
as 5:2024cv04402
Plaintiff:
DB COMMUNICATIONS LLC D/B/A MULTIPLY
Defendant:
X CORP.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Frazier v. X Corp.
as 24-1948
Petitioner:
YOSUB KIM, SHELLY YIP, NICHOLAS TAPALANSKY and others
Respondent:
X HOLDINGS CORP, formerly known as X Holdings I, Inc. and X CORP., formerly known as Twitter, Inc.
v. X Corp.
as 3:2024mc80175
Petitioner:
HYBE Co., Ltd.
Unknown:
X Corp.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv04054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Tamah Clark, et al v. X Corp., et al
as 24-12155
Plaintiff:
TAMAH JADA CLARK, Ex Rel. and ANTI-SEMITISM DEFENSE LEAGUE
Defendant:
X CORP., WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS and AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
Abadi v. Adams
as 24-1608
Plaintiff:
AARON ABADI
Defendant:
ERIC ADAMS, in his personal capacity, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, BILL DE BLASIO, in his personal capacity and others
Buchwalter v. Twitter, Inc., et al.
as 24-3684
Plaintiff:
GREGG BUCHWALTER, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
TWITTER, INC., Delaware corporation; Successor X Corp, GOOGLE LLC, a limited liability company, ALPHABET INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Ryan v. X Corp
as 3:2024cv03553
Defendant:
Jeremy Ryan and X CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ryan v. X CORP., Successor in Interest to TWITTER, INC.
as 3:2024cv03547
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ryan
Defendant:
X CORP., Successor in Interest to TWITTER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ryan v. X CORP.
as 3:2024cv03551
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ryan
Defendant:
X CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
