Cases 31 - 40 of 56
US v. Shapat Nabaya
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 19-7302
Defendant / Appellant:
SHAPAT AHDAWAN NABAYA, a/k/a Norman Abbott
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Shapat Nabaya
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 19-6584
Defendant / Appellant:
SHAPAT AHDAWAN NABAYA, a/k/a Norman Abbott
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nabaya v. Underwood
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2019cv01216
Respondent:
M Underwood
Petitioner:
Shapat Nabaya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nabaya v. Bureau of Prisons et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2019cv00215
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, John Doe, NFN Broadnak and others
Plaintiff:
Shapat Nabaya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nabaya v. Dinkin et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2019cv00171
Defendant:
H. Wesley Robinson, Alex F. Kochanowski and William J. Dinkin
Plaintiff:
Shapat Nabaya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nabaya v. Underwood
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2018cv01460
Petitioner:
Shapat Nabaya
Respondent:
M Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nabaya v. White
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2018cv00891
Petitioner:
Shapat Nabaya
Respondent:
D. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.