Cases 41 - 50 of 862
PYLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21306
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH PYLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pyles v. Freshour et al
as 1:2023cv01281
Petitioner:
Terry L Pyles
Respondent:
Alex Freshour, Ryan Sterbing and Matt Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bradbury et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv02355
Plaintiff:
William F. Bradbury, Jr., Danny E. Starner, Christopher Ford and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC), JPay/Securus Technologies, Viapath Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PYLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18030
Plaintiff:
SEAN PYLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SpinX Games, Ltd. v. Carrisa Pyles
as 23-15950
Petitioner / Appellant:
SPINX GAMES, LTD.
Respondent / Appellee:
CARRISA PYLES
Terry Pyles v. Jacob Daily
as 23-2302
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRY L. PYLES
Defendant / Appellee:
JACOB DAILY, Officer
PYLE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv03442
Plaintiff:
LESTER H PYLE and LESTER H. PYLE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Prince Jones v. US
as 23-6610
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRINCE JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LIEUTENANT JERALD RIFFLE, OFFICER TREVOR GEORGE and others
PYLE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv00815
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE PYLE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
