Cases 41 - 50 of 215
Pridgen v. Suarau et al
as 5:2020ct03248
Plaintiff:
Richard Pridgen
Defendant:
Nursing Staff, Dr. Stewart, Dr. Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2020cv00361
Defendant:
David Knight, Mary-Ann Balwin, Patrick Buffkin and others
Plaintiff:
Living Ultra Violet Inc. and Conrad Paul James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STEWART v. EMERGE ORTHO et al
as 1:2020cv00629
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, LT. FAIRCLOTH, EMERGE ORTHO and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BRADLEY STEWART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. EMERGE ORTHO et al
as 1:2020cv00505
Defendant:
EMERGE ORTHO, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and MEDICAL STAFF
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BRADLEY STEWART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POLK v. USA
as 1:2020cv00462
Petitioner:
STEWART KEITH POLK
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
O'Brien et al v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company et al
as 5:2020cv00208
Plaintiff:
Leonard Pryor, Candi Ellis, Thomas Keister and others
Defendant:
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes v. D.P.S, NC Corr
as 1:2020cv00104
Defendant:
D.P.S. NC State Agency Institution and Board, Clarence Stewart, D.P.S., NC Corr and others
Plaintiff:
Delmar Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00159
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
HOSEY v. TOWN OF LANDIS, NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2020cv00310
Defendant:
MEREDITH BARE SMITH, TONY CORRIHER, KATIE MARIE SELLS and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER L HOSEY, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STEWART v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00257
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
NAOMI W. STEWART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
