Cases 41 - 50 of 2,815
USA v. Artez Johnson
as 24-1153
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ARTEZ L. JOHNSON
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Carey L. Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bounds v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Willie Ray Bounds
Defendant:
Kirsten L Johnson, Randy Jones and Zack Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Hallstein et al
as 1:2024cv01050
Plaintiff:
Suzanne L Johnson and Suzanne L Johnston
Defendant:
Michelle Hallstein, Thadeus Hallstein, Jason Bolen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. GALKIN et al
as 2:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
MR. SETH GALKIN, ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. RIAZ et al
as 2:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
AY RIAZ, MENDEZ, N60 JA P.O. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
EARL SCOTT, GREGORY WILLIAMS and ZAIRE PALMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. LAVELLE et al
as 2:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DETECTIVE LAVELLE, SERGEANT HOFFMAN, DALY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. MARONE et al
as 2:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
ISHMALE MARONE, CHASITY BEST, MARQUISE MANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
