Cases 41 - 50 of 126
Basher et al v. Fishbien et al
as 1:2017cv03596
Defendant:
2166 Dean LLC and Paul Fishbien
Plaintiff:
Abul Basher and Yusuf Abdur Rahman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Penaloza v. Abdur-Rahman et al
as 2:2017cv01015
Plaintiff:
Robert Penaloza
Defendant:
Salahuddin Abdur-Rahman and B. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Basher et al v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv03025
Plaintiff:
Yusef Abdur-Rahman and Abul Basher
Defendant:
Green Tree Servicing, LLC and President Tony Renzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shufelt v. Miranda et al
as 2:2017cv01014
Plaintiff:
George W. Shufelt
Defendant:
Rafael Miranda, Abdur Rahman, Dante Vacca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SKUBINSKI v. RAHMAN et al
as 3:2016cv09483
Plaintiff:
EDWARD SKUBINSKI
Defendant:
TAALIB UD ABDUR RAHMAN, SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO. OF ARIZONA, LLC , JOHN DOE 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Abdur-Rahman v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv04117
Plaintiff:
Dawan Abdur-Rahman
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock, Don Stapley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCGRUE et al v. LEW et al
as 1:2016cv00860
Plaintiff:
JEFF MCGRUE and YUSUF ABDUR-RAHMAN
Defendant:
JACOB J. LEW and MARY JO WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Dennis v. Kerman et al
as 2:2016cv00542
Plaintiff:
Matthew Dennis
Defendant:
Scott Kerman, J. Clark Kelso, J. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Greenleaf et al
as 2:2016at00125
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Garcia
Defendant:
Delmar L. Greenleaf, randall lankford, Salahuddin Abdur-Rahman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garcia v. Greenleaf et al
as 2:2016cv00269
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Garcia
Defendant:
Delmar Greenleaf, Randall Lankford, Salahuddin Abdur-Rahman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
