Cases 41 - 50 of 741
Wilson v. Saint Clair County et al
as 2:2023cv01304
Plaintiff:
Antwone Lonezo Wilson
Defendant:
Saint Clair County, Arnaldo Mercado, Brian Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newell v. Chester Mental Health Center et al
as 3:2023cv02911
Plaintiff:
Antwon R Newell, Jr.
Defendant:
Chester Mental Health Center and Travis Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00307
Petitioner:
Antwon Ravon Buchanan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00133
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Dennis v. Annucci et al
as 1:2023cv06899
Plaintiff:
Antwon Dennis
Defendant:
Commissioner Anthony Annucci, Sergeant Joseph and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Edmond et al
as 2:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Antwone Wilson
Defendant:
Lt Edmond and Brewster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21065
Plaintiff:
ANTWON RAMON THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARRIS et al v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
LAKEISHA HARRIS, MANUEL D CHAVOUS, YOLANDA S BAKER and others
Defendant:
RONALD D DESANTIS, JOSEPH A LADAPO, MICHELE TALLENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berry v. Does
as 2:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Antwon Berry, Sr
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amos v. Does
as 2:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Antwon Berry, Sr and Na'talyn Amos
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
