Cases 41 - 50 of 364
Bells et al v. Groves
as 0:2022cv03422
Plaintiff:
Charlie Buddha Bells, Jr., Kurt Adams and Randy Jackson
Defendant:
Robert Groves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bells v. Woosley
as 4:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Charlie Buddha Bells, Jr.
Defendant:
Jason Woosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Carlos Bell, Jr.
as 22-2506
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Carlos D. Bell, Jr.
Bells, Jr. v. Bergami et al
as 3:2022cv50245
Petitioner:
Charlie Buddha Bells, Jr. and Felisha Bells
Respondent:
Mr. T. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
BELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09348
Plaintiff:
RANDALL BELL, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bell v. Gladieux et al
as 1:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Ray L Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Gladieux and Allen County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charlie Bells, Jr. v. Rodget Sargent
as 22-5498
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE BELLS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
RODGET SARGENT
Charlie Bells, Jr. v. Groves, et al
as 22-55513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE B. BELLS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
GROVES, Correction Officer and JOHN DOES
Defendant:
SMITH, Correction Officer and FLOREZ
Bell, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00723
Plaintiff:
Richard Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Bell et al v. City Chevrolet LLC
as 4:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
William Edward Bell, Jr and Staci Marie Bell
Defendant:
City Chevrolet LLC d/b/a Cable-Dahmer of Kansas City and City Chevrolet, LLC doing business as Cable-Dahmer of Kansas City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
