Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01846
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hindle v. Boch T South, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv11306
Plaintiff: Derek Hindle and Meredith Partridge
Defendant: Boch T South, Inc. , John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Whitney v. Cronin et al
as 6:2018cv06260
Plaintiff: Richard Whitney
Defendant: S. Cronin, M. Passage, B. Boch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00262
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01142
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gambino v. Dr. Moubarek et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2017cv02311
Plaintiff: David A. Gambino
Defendant: Dr. Moubarek, Carol Miller, Kristi Crites and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nij Boch v. Lynch
as 16-3976
Petitioner: Erick Nij Boch, AKA Erick Nijboch
Respondent: Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney General
David Gambino v. Dr. Moubarek We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-6647
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID A. GAMBINO
Defendant - Appellee: DR. MOUBAREK, MD, CAROL MILLER, HIT, KRISTI CRITES, CRNP and others
Moses v. Stewart et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2015cv03875
Plaintiff: Joshua Moses
Defendant: Timothy S. Stewart, S. Mohamed Moubarek, Maria Arviza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv13489
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?